or you could be accessing an svnsync mirror that is out of date..
why are you not using the ^ syntax for relative paths
I would be wary of somebody typing merge for different protocols...
that the hostname resolves to the same ip and the protocols match is IMHO
enough
-Stephen
2009/3/11 Ryan Schmidt <subversion-2009a_at_ryandesign.com>
> On Mar 10, 2009, at 23:44, Mark Eichin wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> >
> >> When checking if merge tracking is to be used, a check is
> >> contained if the adressed repos are the same. Where can I setup
> >> that for example "svn://MyServer/myrepo/trunk" and "svn://Myserver/
> >> myrepo/trunk" are considered a to be the same repo, since the
> >> (case-insensitve) server names are the same.
> >
> > A related problem is that svn://svnserver and
> > svn://svnserver.my.domain are treated as distinct. (Given that
> > repositories have uuids, should the code in question even be *looking*
> > at the dns name?)
>
> Or you could be accessing the same repository via multiple protocols
> (svn:// and http://). I agree it seems reasonable to use the
> repository UUID and not care about the URL.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=1306599
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [
> users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=1306898
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-03-11 17:20:28 CET