On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:56, David Weintraub <qazwart_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks! This is the information I was looking for. I'm going to try
> the CollabNet Desktop -- Eclipse Edition. I also know to make sure
> that developers are using JavaHL (especially since we'd have to
> license SVNKit).
Why would you have to license SVNKit? If you're a "consumer" of it, or
distributing an Open Source project that uses it, it's Open Source. If
you want to integrate it into a non-Open Source application, then you
have to license it.
http://svnkit.com/licensing.html
I just checked; I'm using JavaHL, and it's the only option I have
installed. I have Eclipse 3.4.1 and the current Subclipse installed. I
can't complain about the performance but I'm sure my WCs & projects
are much smaller than yours.
> We are going to be redoing our infrastructure. If we get rid of
> Microsoft Exchange and go with a more "Open" email and calendar
> provider, we wouldn't need Windows desktops for developers. Instead,
> we could have Linux machines which seem much faster with Eclipse.
>
> One of our developers took his desktop machine, installed RedHat, and
> then used an open VM to install Windows as a virtual machine. He does
> his development in Linux and uses the Windows side for Outlook and
> MS-Word. Maybe that's the way we should be going.
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 6:01 PM, David Weintraub <qazwart_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'm attempting to get this running on my machine. This is a dual core
>>> Pentium with a gigabyte of memory. Checking out in Subversion via
>>> Eclipse Ganymede using the most recent copy of Subclipse and running
>>> SVNkit took almost 13 minutes.
>>>
>>> A similar task on Linux via the command line takes about five.
>>> However, checking out from CVS was not much faster. It took about 10
>>> minutes. This is a big project (probably too big).
>>>
>>> I've tried a merge, and Eclipse crashed (probably needs more memory
>>> for its Java process. I'm attempting to try again.
>>>
>>> What I am trying to find out is who uses Windows XP/Eclipse/Subversion
>>> combination and whether they also have performance issues. Do you use
>>> Subversive or Subclipse? Do you use SVNKit or JavaHL (which doesn't
>>> seem available on my installation)?
>>
>> I'd say most users use it on Windows. JavaHL is preferred. This Wiki
>> page explains how to get it working:
>>
>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/wiki/JavaHL
>>
>> Subclipse has to do more than a command line checkout as Eclipse does
>> some stuff and the svn status of all items is calculated and cached.
>> So it is normal for it to be slower than the command line.
>>
>> For merge you should use CollabNet Desktop. This includes/works with Subclipse.
>>
>> http://desktop-eclipse.open.collab.net/
>>
>> --
>> Thanks
>>
>> Mark Phippard
>> http://markphip.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> David Weintraub
> qazwart_at_gmail.com
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=982891
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=982898
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2008-12-11 17:06:21 CET