Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Steve Whitson <steven.whitson_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I've not gotten any response to my minimum version question (subject "what
>> apache version is acceptable with subversion 1.5.1)... and have been
>> relegated to using v1.4.6 with apache 2.0.63. I only saw one place where
>> any reference to v1.5.0 was made with apache 2.0.x, and that was a pre-built
>> binary for windows, not exactly useful since I'm needing a solaris target.
>>
>
> I think we'd certainly encourage using the latest 2.0.x version, but
> AFAIK, the minimum version is the same as it always has been.
> Something like 2.0.49? It is mentioned in INSTALL:
>
> http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/branches/1.5.x/INSTALL
>
>
That was the premise I was working from... but couldn't get things to
work (couldn't get svn 1.5.1 to work on apache v2.0.63) as noted in this
message thread. I also worked to move up to apache 2.2.x (now 2.2.9)
and found a roadblock replacing my mod_auth_mysql security piece using
either the mod_auth_mysql patch (for apache 2.2.x) or the now supported
mod_authn_dbd module (problems which I pursued on the apache forum).
Giulio mentioned (was under the impression) that svn 1.5.1 requires
apache 2.2.x (also noted in this thread). I've dug around for
documentation substantiating this, but to no avail. The INSTALL text
file you mention is the only reference I can locate. There's a bit more
details I found wrt prepackaged binarys (from collabnet) and apache
versions included with them in my other message (subject: what apache
version is acceptable with subversion 1.5.1).
Thanks much,
-Steve
Received on 2008-08-14 16:18:05 CEST