[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: http vs file

From: marc gonzalez-carnicer <carnicer.lists_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-06-06 00:09:41 CEST

I agree with Ryan. svn under http can only be easier to install than
svnserve if you are already an apache admin.

i said it was easier assuming you have never done any of them, as
was my case.

2007/6/5, Ryan Schmidt <subversion-2007b@ryandesign.com>:
> On Jun 5, 2007, at 13:05, Sheryl wrote:
>
> >> 2007/6/5, Matt Sickler:
> >>
> >>> either use apache + mod_dav_svn or svnserve - the latter
> >>> probably being
> >>> easier
> >>
> >> svnserve is much, much easier than apache to setup (at least under
> >> linux)
> >
> > I didn't find it so, and I like being able to use websvn.
> > Different strokes.
>
> WebSVN and other web-based repository viewers such as Trac and ViewVC
> should not care what method you use to serve your repository, and
> should function just as well if you use svnserve or file-based access
> to the repository.
>
> That said, I too found Subversion easy enough to set up with Apache
> 2, but I didn't even try svnserve because I'm already an Apache 2
> administrator, so I liked having one less thing to need to learn.
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jun 6 00:10:03 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.