On Friday 09 March 2007 13:15, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On 3/9/07, Wesley J. Landaker <wjl@icecavern.net> wrote:
> > 1.5 would be *well* worth it just for SASL and sparse directory support
> > IMHO. Merge tracking will be an excellent improvment, but I'm much less
> > interested in getting that quickly. =)
>
> Everyone should understand the sparse directories are mainly going to be
> included at the API level. I do not think there is going to be any
> command line level UI to create them (in the proposed timeframe). In
> theory, various GUI tools or other consumers of the API could do
> something with them though.
>
> I think if some UI did create a working copy that used this feature,
> command line options like update should respect them.
Okay, but 1.5 would be still be *well* worth it just for SASL support. ;)
--
Wesley J. Landaker <wjl@icecavern.net> <xmpp:wjl@icecavern.net>
OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094 0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6 E3D2
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Fri Mar 9 21:28:59 2007