Re: Poor performance in windows. Switching back to CVS

From: Eric <spamsink_at_scoot.netis.com>
Date: 2007-02-07 17:32:35 CET

At 11:17 AM 2/7/2007, Steve Bakke wrote:

<SB>>>>>Updates are definitely not atomic as you could have an error
part-way through an update and your working copy will be in an
intermediate state. That's one of the reasons why you need 'svn cleanup'.<<<<<

Right, run svn cleanup followed by another svn update, right?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Feb 7 17:32:47 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ivan Aleman: "Re: how to restore from a svnadmin hotcopy"
Previous message: Bolstridge, Andrew: "RE: Working copy locked problem"
In reply to: Steve Bakke: "Re: Poor performance in windows. Switching back to CVS"
Next in thread: John Allen: "Re: Poor performance in windows. Switching back to CVS"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]