Re: Poor performance in windows. Switching back to CVS

On Feb 7, 2007, at 13:02, Dmitri Colebatch wrote:

> Do you guys tag at all? We've recently migrated a 16000 odd file
> repository and have certainly found that some operations are slower,
> but the tagging speed of svn compared to cvs is something that would
> definately stop me from switching back (o:

Tagging sure is fast... we're forced by the way we chose to structure
our repository to use svncopy to pin our externals when we branch. This
entails

* checkout
* grovel, grovel, grovel, grovel
* commit

Not fast. But, fast enough for my purposes. I certainly wouldn't want
to go back to CVS. Not only is rename nice, but the efficient handling
of binary files allows us to use SVN in situations where we wouldn't
have bothered to consider CVS.

// ben

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Feb 7 15:58:27 2007