[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

FW: RE: Subversion vs CVS for document files

From: Robert Graf-Waczenski <rgw_at_lsoft.com>
Date: 2006-11-16 13:40:32 CET

I hit "Reply" too quickly...

Robert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Graf-Waczenski [mailto:rgw@lsoft.com]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 16. November 2006 13:40
> To: Steve O'Hara
> Subject: RE: RE: Subversion vs CVS for document files
>
>
> > Before you get too carried away with the VSS bashing, it's worth
> > pointing out that any VSS users with any kind of sense, are not using
> > the VSS client, but rather SourceOffSite server.
>
> But bashing is fun :-)
>
> No, serious: SourceOffSite licenses cost *extra* money
> whereas the VSS client comes (almost) free with several other M$
> products.
>
> Still your observation is correct: Since all working copies are maintained
> by the SourceOffSite server, the timestamp offset problems don't occur.
>
> Robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 16 13:41:21 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.