On 21-Mar-06, at 2:41 PM, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Scott Palmer <scott.palmer@2connected.org> writes:
>> On 16-Mar-06, at 2:09 PM, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>>> If the url-to-foo was renamed to url-to-bar sometime before r10
>>> (i.e.,
>>> before HEAD), then this is indeed an error.
>>
>> I'm not sure I understand. How is it possible to for ANYTHING to
>> happen after HEAD since HEAD is by definition the latest?
>> Do you mean that the rename could not be part of the changes in rev
>> 10 (HEAD)? Why not?
>
> Hmm, I don't quite understand your question (I wrote "before" not
> "after"),
Yeah that was my point... you wrote 'before' and I thought at first
that it was redundant to say such a thing. Then I realized that you
might mean that the rename could not be IN the HEAD revision.
The clarification that I was looking for was if there is a
distinction between doing the rename and the content change in two
different revisions vs. having the content change and the rename as
part of the same transaction... and therefore it could BE "HEAD" vs.
BEFORE "HEAD".. and of course there is no "after"
I don't think it is particularly important with respect to the
original issue :)
Scott
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 23 11:03:04 2006