Re: "Lightweight" externals - is it possible?

On 14.10.2005 03:24, Lev Serebryakov wrote:

> (1) "svn up", "svn status" run sub-connections for externals. On link with
> big latencity and "svn+ssh" used as protocol it is not very fast operation.
> It is needed in general case, but in my case externasl point into same repo.
> (2) "svn ci" doesn't follow externals. So, If I change application (add new
> code) and change library (fix bug, which was found by this new applictaion's
> code), I need two "svn ci", or even more than two, because different parts
> of library (code, language files, etc) is injected in different points in
> application tree.

These problems come up over and over on both user@ and dev@ list, but
somehow never seem to be addressed by the Subversion developers. It
seems that all thatt the users can do is vote on the relevant issue
reports, althought it is not clear whether anybody actually pays
attention to vote counts...
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/buglist.cgi?issue_id=1167,1258,1336,1935

-- 
Aleksey Nogin
Home Page: http://nogin.org/
E-Mail: nogin@cs.caltech.edu (office), aleksey@nogin.org (personal)
Office: Moore 04, tel: (626) 395-2200
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org