Re: Help with very large repositories

Oliver Pajonk wrote:
> 2005/8/27, Blair Zajac <blair@orcaware.com <mailto:blair@orcaware.com>>:
>
> svnadmin create --fs-type bdb --bdb-txn-nosync repos
>
> Just a thought: it seems to be that FSFS repositories are more stable
> and in most parts faster than BDB repositories (if backed by a decent
> filesystem). Most people that reported problems with broken repositories
> had BDB ones and their problems were fixed almost everytime when they
> changed to FSFS.
>
> Is there a special reason why you use BDB?

I've switched all of my repositories to FSFS myself. I was just saying that for
Michael, who mentioned that he was using BDB.

IIRC, in the minor timing tests I did importing a decent sized repository a long
time ago, FSFS and BDB without transaction syncing are roughly the same speed.

Regards,
Blair

-- 
Blair Zajac, Ph.D.
<blair@orcaware.com>
Subversion and Orca training and consulting
http://www.orcaware.com/svn/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org