[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: git is a lot better than SVN (???)

From: Marc Sherman <msherman_at_projectile.ca>
Date: 2005-08-16 22:19:12 CEST

David Weintraub wrote:
>
> I have personally found that distributed systems aren't all that
> distributed. Most developers don't want other users using their
> machines for syncing back and forth to the archive. Instead,
> developers depend upon a very few machines that become the central
> archive for everyone. In the end, everyone is syncing to the same
> servers and hitting the same bottle necks.

Distributed systems also support hierarchical layered development, which
SVN currently doesn't directly support very easily.

For example, at my company, we maintain a private local fork of
Subclipse which we use internally. Currently, we do that using a vendor
branch, which is updated each time Subclipse releases. It would be nice
to be able to do that by having our local repo synch from the Subclipse
repo, but one-way only, so that our local mods never get synched
upstream (where they're not wanted). That way, we could build our mods
based on any arbitrary trunk rev of Subclipse, just by forcing a synch.

- Marc

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Aug 16 22:20:37 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.