Please, can anyone comment anything about the above posting. Many people
in the list will appreciate it:
> Hello,
>
> We have implemented SVN in our web development team. We have a directory
> called /usr/respositories which has a directory for each project. We did
> smthg like:
>
> $svnadmin create /usr/repository/project-foo
> $svnadmin create /usr/repository/project-bar
> $svn import /apache/foo/public_html file:///usr/repository/project-foo
> $svn import /apache/bar/public_html file:///usr/repository/project-bar
>
> I have the following questions reagrding this situation:
>
> 1. Is a good practise to have a repository for each project if they dont
> share files ?
>
> 2. Does this model make sense? Now, each developer has to 'checkout' a
> project in their hgome directory, make changes, and then 'commit', but,
> what if he remove a function that another developer, doing somthg similar,
> actually need it ? If the project manager is the only person able to
> 'commit' changes how to manage the web developer changes that some of them
> are accept but other dont.
>
> 3. Regarding project manager role, how to implement a hierarchy of users?
> Or, better, are the changes handle by revision, so, if the developer A
> commit bad code, and B commit good code, then, I take revision from B and
> how to avoid A commited code?
>
> Sorry for the confusion, too many concepts at the begining,
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> fabio.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jun 8 00:19:48 2005