Umputun wrote:
> You can try eSvn (http://esvn.umputun.com/) - a GUI frontend to the
> Subversion revision system (QT-based application)
>
> --
> Eugene
>
> Steve Cohen wrote:
>
>> I asked a question about subeclipse here and was told this wasn't the
>> place. After using it for awhile I find it truly isn't ready for
>> primetime. But that's not the point of this post.
>> Can someone tell me how close to being a finished product rapidsvn
>> is? Is it more or less solid than subeclipse? Should I just bite the
>> bullet for now and prepare to live at the command line? Or is
>> rapidsvn worth a try?
>>
>> Steve Cohen
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
>
Unfortunately, I can't install on my RedHat 9.0 system. Looks like I
would pretty much have to go with Fedora. Anyone care to comment on how
hairy the upgrade path is?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Feb 1 04:17:52 2005