looking for references on the evil that is *CVS*

Hi All,

Similar to Robert, I am trying to convince a dev-group here to move from
CVS to SVN. I *know* SVN is better (tm), but I need more arguments.
Arguments I used until now:

- atomic commits
- better handling of binaries
- it's new and cool :)

Also there is some resistance against the copy-merge philosophy. People
here came from VSS, and are happy with the checkout-warning in CVSNT. I
am trying to convince them that this does not give them security, only
slows down the development efforts.

Any ideas more then welcome!

Pim

This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 6 13:29:20 2005