[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: [Spam] Re: svn versus cvs

From: Natalya Smirnov <Natalya.Smirnov_at_reuters.com>
Date: 2004-11-15 21:08:10 CET

Is SVN faster than CVS in terms of commits, checkout/ins...?

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Neary [mailto:david@phenix.fr]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 10:37 AM
To: Natalya Smirnov
Cc: users@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: [Spam] Re: svn versus cvs

Hi Natalya,

Natalya Smirnov wrote:
> I plan to switch to either svn or cvs. What would you recommend? What
is
> more convenient and faster?

If you are switching, then svn is definitely a better choice. Subversion

was designed to replace CVS, and it overcomes many architectural
limitations of CVS and adds a number of important functionalities.

The Subversion front page lists several of these:
http://subversion.tigris.org/

Cheers,
Dave.

-- 
David Neary
Phenix Engineering
110 ave Jean Jaures, 69007 Lyon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
-----------------------------------------------------------------
        Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for more
information and to register, visit http://www.reuters.com/messaging
Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Nov 15 21:18:33 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.