[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: CVS/SVN comparison

From: Mark Phippard <MarkP_at_softlanding.com>
Date: 2004-10-23 01:28:17 CEST

> Lurking on this list I see that a large bulk of the problems people
> have is configuring Apache and or the Berkley database, with
> permissions and paths and whatnot... svnserve and fsfs just eliminates
> those issues in one simple step :). Simple I like.

Just for your reference, these problems rarely occur on Windows. Also,
installing and configuring Apache is very easy on Windows.

A lot of *nix users are reluctant to use Apache because they already have
it deployed, especially with older versions like 1.3. For them, they have
to upgrade so many pieces in order to deploy it, they do not want to.

Anyway, it is worth trying. The whole thing is very easy on Windows
servers.

Mark

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 23 01:28:42 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.