Brad Appleton <brad@bradapp.net> wrote on 09/24/2004 04:02:17 PM:
> > My whole point was exactly what you said.
> > Same effect/result via different means
>
> I think what you said was
> "same effect via different means == essentially the same thing"
> and I think that what I said was
> "same effect via different means !necessarily= the same thing"
OK, got you. Actually though, when I said "essentially the same thing" I
was just trying to say "same effect via different means". I wasn't trying
to draw conclusions or imply that there were not some differences. Just
that the same end effect was mostly achieved.
> I think do do that we need to "step out" of the current
> terms and mechanisms used by both SVN and CVS and refer
> to the concepts by their names instead of by their
> implementation.
I sort of follow you, but I think you present too much information to
follow up on. I think if you could present a specific scenario you view
as a problem, or at least sub-optimal, followed by a specific proposal, it
would be easier to follow and comment on. If you have multiples, deal
with them as separate threads. I do realize, you are trying to throw a
lot out of info out there for a reason. I just think it makes it easy to
kill the conversation, which is obviously not your intent.
Thanks
Mark
_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Sep 24 23:02:02 2004