Re: I miss tags

OK. I think I'm about to go back into lurk mode on this
subject, but not quite yet. And I'm not being querulous
for the sake of querulousness, if that's a word. :-)

>> If every child subdirectory of tags represents a static tag and
>> if every child subdirectory of branches represents a branch tag,
>> wouldn't it be easy?
>>
>> subdirectory name = tag name. Done.
>
> You are assuming a very simple situation, that is why. My application
> releases, as an example, invariably involve dozens of "projects", so my
> tag structure might look like this:
>
>
> /tags
> /releaseXYZ
> /project1
> /project2
> /project3
> /project4
> /project5
> /project6
> /project7

So in this case, all 7 projects would be in releaseXYZ.

> And it could very well be:
>
> /tags
> /releaseXYZ
> /docs
> /project1
> /project2
> /eclipse
> /project3
> /project4
> /web
> /project5
> /project6
> /win32
> /project7

So in this case, all 7 projects would ALSO be in releaseXYZ.

I don't see any difference in the tag name, releaseXYZ, only
in the way you have your hierarchy organized.

Raye.

> Unless I was forced to maintain this structure everywhere, at every point
> in time, I think it could be difficult for Subversion to discern which
> folder to go use.
>
> Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Sep 23 21:18:27 2004