On Sep 13, 2004, at 10:20 AM, Scott Palmer wrote:
> I was just reading through the 1.1 release notes and the blurb about
> the pros and cons of 'fsfs'. It seems that at least for my purposes
> 'fsfs' is superior. I know the others in my office would not tolerate
> a database that would need to be un-wedged every so often.
I've been running subversion for a little over a year now and about 6
months in a production environment. I've yet to see a wedged
repository. We used both linux and windows servers. I really don't
think wedging happens as much as you think it will.
As for FSFS, I too really want to give this a try. My work however
wants to wait for another few months (after 1.1) to see if any problems
creep up. Either way I wouldn't let the wedging worry you that much. We
have about 5000+ commits and no problems. Subversion really is a great
Received on Mon Sep 13 04:31:02 2004
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s