Re: sub-versions?

On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 08:14:58PM +0200, Branko ??ibej wrote:
> Jacob Atzen wrote:
>
> >What you're looking for is called a distributed version control
> >system. There are several out there. Perhaps the most famous is Tom
> >Lord's Arch -- now under the GNU umbrella.
> >
> >You might also find some inspiration in the Subversion FAQ:
> ><http://subversion.tigris.org/project_faq.html#changesets>
> >
> Of course, this isn't the right list for posting Arch advocacy. We
> much prefer users who need distributed repositories to use svk,
> http://svk.elixus.org/, which is based on Subversion and some of whose
> functionality will probably (hopefully) find its way into Subversion
> proper.

I'm sorry, I didn't mean to advocate anything. I just wanted to help the
O.P. make an informed choice as he didn't seem to know the concept of a
distributed vcs.

Don't get me wrong -- I'm as excited about Subversion as anyone. And as
svk was already mentioned by another post I found it redundant to
mention it again (not to mention the fact that I had never heard of svk
before that post).

-- 
Cheers,
- Jacob Atzen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org