[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: RE: "not under version control" error - continued

From: Mike Javorski <mjavorski_at_spokesoftware.com>
Date: 2004-02-11 01:45:47 CET

Any news on this issue? There has been another occurrence of this merge bug reported by Adam Lackorzynski in the dev list (http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=56106)

I am starting to get a bit concerned here.. Merge is a core function for any version control system; if the problem stems from something deeper this could be an even bigger issue, and 1.0 is suppposed to be just around the corner..

I have several people that want to start using our repository and I can't safely let them do that at the moment if their data is being corrupted (possibly)..

I would really appreciate any help you all can give.. Please let me know if there is any further details that would help to diagnose the problem.

Thanks,

- Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Javorski
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 3:05 PM
To: users@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: RE: "not under version control" error - continued

Anyone have any ideas? Need more info?

Anyone.... Anyone.... Bueller..... :-D

- Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Francois Beausoleil [mailto:fbos@users.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 3:48 PM
To: Mike Javorski; users@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: "not under version control" error - continued

On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 15:12:49 -0800, "Mike Javorski" <mjavorski@spokesoftware.com> said: [snip]
> Now it looks like this may not be a unique issue.. I say that because
> Francois Beausoleil [fbos@users.sourceforge.net] posted to the user
> list

The thread in question is here: http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=5435

> today that he was having a similar inconsistency between merges with
> "--dry-run" and without. His seemed to be merging correctly without
> the "--dry-run"; though I suspect if he commits a few more items
> (directories esp.) it will become as bad as mine. (as everything new
> that I add seems to be showing this problem).
>
[snip]

I do have a reproduction recipe, so it seems this bug is not related to content. Although it seems to be triggered by binary items (non text/* svn:mime-type).

I also reported another issue with --dry-run a long time ago: http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgId=294631

That thread basically said that --dry-run reported an error message that an added file did not exist, instead of simply saying "A file".

Bye !
François
Developer of Java Gui Builder
http://jgb.sourceforge.net/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Feb 11 01:45:43 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.