Simon,
I don't know, I have never tried it.
Yes, 80/second is a lot. Very unnecessary.
On Jan 27, 7:22 am, Simon Large <simon.tortoise..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On 27 January 2012 11:58, Stefan Küng <tortoise..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 27.01.2012 12:36, Frank Jaworski wrote:
> >> Fri Jan 27 06:33:22 2012 : Auth: Login OK: [fdj2] (from client
> >> osscvs2.cit port 0)
> > [snip]
> >> Fri Jan 27 06:33:23 2012 : Auth: Login OK: [fdj2] (from client
> >> osscvs2.cit port 0)
>
> >> All those still occured with registry change. Doing operations, this
> >> almost translates to a DoS on the server.
>
> > So you're saying that your server has problems dealing with so many
> > requests? Or what exactly is the problem here?
> > Just a log file with multiple entries doesn't count at all as a problem.
>
> They all have the same timestamp, or within 1 second. 80 auth requests
> per second from a single client does look a bit excessive.
>
> Simon
>
> --
> : ___
> : oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
> : (_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
> : \ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
> : /_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
>
> ------------------------------------------------------http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMess...
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscr..._at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=2911944
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2012-01-27 21:30:04 CET