[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Repository migration between different access methods

From: Simon Large <simon.tortoisesvn_at_googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:22:20 +0100

2009/9/2 el_es <el.es.cr_at_gmail.com>:
> Andy Levy <andy.levy@...> writes:
>
>
>> > I think I will get rid of the history anyway. Because it wasn't properly
>> > maintained (and only by one user) and I have too many binary blobs to get rid
>> > of. The real history is about to begin now :)
>>
>> Ultimately it's your decision, but some history can be better than
>> none at all in many cases.
>>
>
> Yeah, I guess so. But it seems the repo was created in a hurry, and so many
> objects (binary compilation products and semi-products) were added, that the
> dump file will really be...
> Oh well unless I use --incremental...

You'll need a full dump, but you can use svndumpfilter to get rid of
selected revisions.

Simon

-- 
:       ___
:  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
: (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
:   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
:   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=2390259
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-09-02 17:22:34 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.