[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Repo "broken"

From: Simon Large <simon.tortoisesvn_at_googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:10:37 +0000

2009/3/23 Robert Roessler <robertr_at_rftp.com>:
> On my Vista SP1 x64 box, I uninstalled one of the recent "1.5.99"
> nightly builds, and installed the released 1.6
> (TortoiseSVN-1.6.0.15855-x64-svn-1.6.0).
>
> When I tried to view the new rev graph on one of my repos, I see a
> "Getting information from repository..." progress indicator - which
> immediately displays a "Want to go offline?" popup.  This popup explains
> that there has been a problem contacting the server...
>
> As I use "file:" repos exclusively, this seems unlikely if taken at face
> value.  Note that if I tell it to go ahead and "work offline for now",
> an instance of TortoiseProc.exe just sits there at 100% CPU.
>
> Other observations:
> 1) all of my other repos behave as expected
>
> 2) the "broken" repo is able to show an apparently reasonable "SVN
> Commit..." dialog (although it shows one file in the WC with a "deleted"
> status that I don't think I would have deleted)

The commit dialog is related only to the WC and doesn't contact the
repo until you start the commit.

> 3) if I attempt an SVN "Clean up" operation from the context menu,
> TortoiseProc.exe crashes with a "0xc0000417" exception at offset "0x54fc0"

Known (and fixed on trunk) bug in TSVN 1.6.0. Cleanup sometimes crashes.

> 4) if I try to start the repo browser on this repo, I see a "Unable to
> open an ra_local session to URL" error in the browser window, along with
> "Can't open file '...\db\min-unpacked-rev': The system cannot find the
> file specified"
>
> The CollabNet SVN 1.6 command-line binaries are not yet available.
>
> Could this repo be in the middle of a pre-1.6 to 1.6 format conversion
> that failed in the middle?

Repositories should not auto-upgrade, but it is possible you created
it with an older nightly and the format has changed. I believe svn was
using sqlite to do some caching a few months ago and that scheme was
changed before the release.

> While this particular repo doesn't have a huge amount of history, I
> would still like to be able to keep it (the history) - are there any
> suggestions, or any requests for additional data or testing?

Simon

-- 
:       ___
:  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
: (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
:   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
:   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=1399724
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-03-24 10:10:50 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.