Stefan Küng wrote:
> Robert Roessler wrote:
>> On my Vista SP1 x64 box, I uninstalled one of the recent "1.5.99"
>> nightly builds, and installed the released 1.6
>> When I tried to view the new rev graph on one of my repos, I see a
>> "Getting information from repository..." progress indicator - which
>> immediately displays a "Want to go offline?" popup. This popup explains
>> that there has been a problem contacting the server...
>> As I use "file:" repos exclusively, this seems unlikely if taken at face
>> value. Note that if I tell it to go ahead and "work offline for now",
>> an instance of TortoiseProc.exe just sits there at 100% CPU.
>> Other observations:
>> 1) all of my other repos behave as expected
>> 2) the "broken" repo is able to show an apparently reasonable "SVN
>> Commit..." dialog (although it shows one file in the WC with a "deleted"
>> status that I don't think I would have deleted)
>> 3) if I attempt an SVN "Clean up" operation from the context menu,
>> TortoiseProc.exe crashes with a "0xc0000417" exception at offset "0x54fc0"
>> 4) if I try to start the repo browser on this repo, I see a "Unable to
>> open an ra_local session to URL" error in the browser window, along with
>> "Can't open file '...\db\min-unpacked-rev': The system cannot find the
>> file specified"
> Seems you're using the BDB repository format. That isn't supported
> anymore in TSVN 1.6 (see the release notes).
> You have to convert your repository to FSFS format if you want to keep
> accessing it via file:///
But no, I have *never* [knowingly] set up a repo to use BDB - even my
very first one, which this isn't... if it helps, the .svn file tree in
the repo and WC appears substantially the same as all the other working
If I need one, is there some definitive test for examining the file
trees of a repo or WC to determine its "format"?
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-03-23 18:35:31 CET