Re: SourceSafe to SVN

Simon Large wrote:
> 2008/8/22 kevin <kcocol_at_gmail.com>:
>> In SourceSafe (SS) we run daily jobs to ensure the DB is sound. If
>> not, we can run jobs to correct. Does SVN require anything like this?
>
> No. VSS is notorious for its DB corruption, and MS's recommendation
> that you check for corruption is an admission that it is completely
> broken. SVN is *much* more robust and this sort of daily check simply
> isn't necessary. That's not to say you don't need a backup, just as
> you do with any important data.

http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.4/svn.ref.svnadmin.c.verify.html
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.4/svn.ref.svnadmin.c.recover.html

Stefan

-- 
       ___
  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net