Simon Large wrote:
> On 07/03/2008, Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Simon Large wrote:
>>
>> >> Should we change our hook scripts to always pass *all* params in a
>> >> defined way?
>> >
>> > That would make the behaviour more like svn hooks, and we could also
>> > provide hook templates which would help with the documentation.
>> >
>> > Are there any disadvantages? What do others think?
>>
>>
>> One disadvantage, yes: the %PATHS% replacement would have to be dropped.
>> Because if that one is passed always, we could easily (too easily) cross
>> the limit of the command line length.
>> That means we'd have to only use %PATH% (the temp file containing the
>> list of files), which however makes it harder to write hook scripts
>> (they will have to read and parse that file first).
>
> I don't think that is a great loss. It should be no harder to parse a
> file containing one filename per line than it is to parse a single
> command line argument containing multiple filenames.
Done in r12295.
Stefan
--
___
oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
(_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
\ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
/_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
Received on 2008-03-08 17:57:17 CET