# Re: TSVNCache questions

From: Robert Roessler <robertr_at_rftp.com>
Date: 2007-11-21 00:46:36 CET

Stefan Küng wrote:
> Robert Roessler wrote:
>
>>>> Yes, same setup as my initial post in this thread: x:\usr\Play\*
>
> Is this a SUBSTed drive? If yes, then you also must include the original
> paths to show the overlays.

No - absolutely nothing "weird" going on with this drive/path - straight
XP SP2 with NTFS, local "fsfs" repo created by TSVN.

Are you saying that with what you believe to be a fully equivalent setup
on a test system of yours, that you get the exact behavior expected from
the algorithm you have described in this thread?

FWIW (probably not much), everything works the way I expect with TCVS
using an "Included folders" setting of x:\usr\Play (without trailing
slashes or * chars)... but then they don't have the drive classes and
exclude paths.

ShellCache::IsPathAllowed (plus where it is called) represents the
relevant logic here?

From the code and by observation, there seems to be no difference
between Include expressions path\ and path\* ?

Robert Roessler
robertr@rftp.com
http://www.rftp.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org