[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

´ð¸´: Re: ´ð¸´: Re: ´ð¸´: Re: ´ð¸´: Re: A performance issue

From: Ö첪ºÀ <bohao_at_sunnorth.com.cn>
Date: 2007-11-20 11:58:59 CET

Hi Stefan,

oh, I see. Thank your! :)

Best regards!

Sincerely,
Alex Zhu

Quality Engineering Department III
Sunnorth Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.
Tel: +86-10-62981668 Ext. 2792 (Office) / 2056 (3G Lab)
Fax: +86-10-62985972
Email: bohao@sunnorth.com.cn


"Stefan K¨¹ng" <tortoisesvn@gmail.com> дÓÚ 2007-11-20 16:29:35:

> On Nov 20, 2007 9:20 AM, Ö첪ºÀ <bohao@sunnorth.com.cn> wrote:
>
> >
> > I knew that. So this is the key point that svn is slower than cvs?
>
> 1. svn is not slower than cvs. It is slower for some operations, much
> faster in others.
> 2. there is no key point. it's a completely different system. That
> means there are multiple factors which must be considered. This is
> *one* point, not a key point or 'the' key point.
>
> Stefan
>
> --
> ___
> oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
> (_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
> \ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
> /_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net

Received on Tue Nov 20 11:59:29 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.