[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: ´ð¸´: Re: ´ð¸´: Re: ´ð¸´: Re: A performance issue

From: Ivan Cenov <i_cenov_at_botevgrad.com>
Date: 2007-11-20 10:09:46 CET

Ö첪ºÀ §ß§Ñ§á§Ú§ã§Ñ:
>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> I knew that. So this is the key point that svn is slower than cvs?
>
> Thanks!
>
Hi,
As a user of SVN in our company and sometimes user of CVS for
an project on internet, I could say that SVN is more sophisticated than
CVS, and it has much more possibilites for controlling the projects.
The time that is 'lost' for slower checkouts is meaningless than the time
saved because of the better project handling in SVN. I don't think that the
main action when working on a project is 'checkout-ing'.

-- 
Regards,
Ivan Cenov
OKTO-7 Co., Botevgrad, Bulgaria
i_cenov@botevgrad.com, imc@okto7.com
  GSM: +359 888 76 10 80
phone: +359 723 6 61 20, +359 723 6 61 61
  fax: +359 723 6 62 62
Received on Tue Nov 20 10:10:09 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.