[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: ´ð¸´: Re: ´ð¸´: Re: A performance issue

From: Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-11-20 09:06:22 CET

On Nov 20, 2007 8:45 AM, Ö첪ºÀ <bohao@sunnorth.com.cn> wrote:
>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> :) I understand. Thus I have words to answer those questions. But could give
> me some detail that why they have such differences? I mean from the buttom
> view point eg. file system, data structure etc.

CVS and Subversion are not the same.

The svn performance when checking out a working copy is affected by
NTFS and the fact that svn keeps a pristine copy of every file in the
working copy. Have a look inside the '.svn' folders in every working
copy and you will see what I mean.

Stefan

-- 
       ___
  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
Received on Tue Nov 20 09:55:15 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.