[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

´ð¸´: Re: ´ð¸´: Re: A performance issue

From: Ö첪ºÀ <bohao_at_sunnorth.com.cn>
Date: 2007-11-20 08:45:35 CET

Hi Stefan,

:) I understand. Thus I have words to answer those questions. But could
give me some detail that why they have such differences? I mean from the
buttom view point eg. file system, data structure etc.

Thanks for your help!

Best regards!

Sincerely,
Alex Zhu

Quality Engineering Department III
Sunnorth Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.
Tel: +86-10-62981668 Ext. 2792 (Office) / 2056 (3G Lab)
Fax: +86-10-62985972
Email: bohao@sunnorth.com.cn


"Stefan K¨¹ng" <tortoisesvn@gmail.com> дÓÚ 2007-11-20 15:38:17:

> On Nov 20, 2007 8:35 AM, Ö첪ºÀ <bohao@sunnorth.com.cn> wrote:
>
> > I has another issue that tortoise cvs on windows is faster than
tortoise svn
> > when checkout that same repository. In this case, they use the same
> > filesystem and the speed is quite different (about 1:3). As a result,
> > previous cvs users complain that every checkout is a waste of time.
>
> You're right. And paint.exe is a lot faster than Photoshop. And
> notepad.exe is a lot faster than OpenOffice.
>
> Stefan
>
> --
> ___
> oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
> (_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
> \ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
> /_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net

Received on Tue Nov 20 08:45:51 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.