Re: TSVN release cycles

On 10 May 2010 18:03, Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09.05.2010 22:58, Simon Large wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I just read this quote from CMike on the CollabNet newsletter,
>> referring to the SVN roadmap.
>>
>> "An admitted shortcoming of this roadmap is its lack of associated
>> release dates. Realistically speaking, I think the myth of returning
>> to six-month release cycles in Subversion has been dispelled by
>> experience. The relatively easy work we were doing years ago is all
>> done, leaving only the challenging stuff. I suspect this means we'll
>> have roughly 9-15 month release cycles, at least until more of the
>> larger plumbing-type tasks are completed."
>>
>> That's a very long release cycle for TSVN to follow. Is it worth
>> trying again at breaking the link between SVN's version numbers and
>> ours?
>
> Have you read this?
> http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=757&dsMessageId=2447244

Yes, I contributed to that thread. I know there was some dissent but I
thought there were more for than against, and that we were starting to
converge on some sort of numbering scheme.

Simon

-- 
:       ___
:  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
: (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
:   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
:   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=757&dsMessageId=2607145
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [dev-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].