2008/11/10 Lübbe Onken | RA Consulting <l.onken_at_rac.de>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Stefan^2
>
> Thanks for the explanation :)
>
> You wrote:
>> Ordinary trees can be collapsed and
>> expanded and so can the revision graph.
>> However, you can also cut a tree,
>> that is, the respective connection
>> is removed and the graph is split
>> into 2 or more separate trees.
>>
>> Maybe, "split" is a better term as
>> "cut" can obviously be confused with
>> "cut'n'paste". The complementary
>> operation is "glue".
>
> So these two are complementary operations? From your explanation cut'n'glue makes sense, since this sounds like paper&scissors. Now if you translate cut'n'glue and split'n'glue into German. How does that sound to you as a native speaker?
> My opinion:
> - - Cut'n'glue: (Ausschneiden/Einkleben) sounds good, the names are complementary but it can be confused with cut'n'paste.
> - - Split'n'glue: (Auftrennen/Einkleben) sounds good too, but the names of the actions are not complementary.
>
> My suggestion:
> - - Split'n'combine: (Auftrennen/Zusammenfügen) sounds good, actions are complementary and it cannot be confused with cut'n'paste
>
> My 0.02€
What does M$ Word say about splitting tables? I don't have it on my PC
here so I can't help. How about split/join?
Simon
--
: ___
: oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
: (_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
: \ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
: /_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on 2008-11-10 13:00:19 CET