>
>
> How about renaming it to "Branch/tag graph" or just "Branch graph" and
> moving its context menu position so it sits in the same group as
> "Branch/tag" and "Switch".
Either name sounds good to me, and would definately clear up some confusion.
Another silly idea:
> If the graph is invoked from a WC (ie not repo-browser), would it be
> useful to have a "Switch..." option in the context menu for each graph
> node? Of course this relies on completing issue 192 first, so that each
> branch has a HEAD node to click on.
>
> Would it be useful to add a branch-graph button to the switch dialog as
> an alternate means of selecting the branch to switch to?
That definately sounds like a useful feature. I could see it being much
easier to switch branches by invoking the branch graph on the root
directory, and selecting the branch I want. Would certainly simplify
employee usage guidelines doc I'll be writing soon for the company.
Received on Sat Jan 21 00:57:49 2006