Simon Large wrote:
> Molle Bestefich wrote:
> > The attached prototype doesn't rely on WSCRIPT nor CSCRIPT.
> > Compiles with VS.Net.
> >
> > Usage: worddiff.exe <base> <modified>
>
> The great advantage of heckling from the sidelines is that I can cheer
> and boo for both sides ;-)
>
> Personally I prefer the script because it's easy to see what is going
> on, and easy for an end-user to personalise, eg. translate into chinese.
The code I submitted could easily be rewritten to be easier to read.
The main() code could be improved readability-wise, and everything
else could be stuffed in a separate file. It will of course never be
quite as easy to read and modify as a VBScript.
But a fair critique nonetheless.
> Once you start shipping extra exe files, everything is locked down
> unless you have the source and a compiler.
- I'm unsure why you would want to modify it?..
- The source is easily accessible..
- The source is easy to compile..
> And many of the people comparing Word docs will not want to be
> compiling code, even if they have VS.net.
Why would they. Just use the .exe. Not sure what you're trying to say.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jul 11 17:23:18 2005