Sven Brueggemann wrote:
> I had a similar phenomenon just yesterday but didn't find the time to
> reproduce yet. Maybe the info I have so far helps?
>
> I moved a working copy into another one (moved c:\wc1 into c:\wc2 so it
> becomes c:\wc2\wc1 [I did this to be able to commit changes to both in
> one transaction]) and used TotalCommander to do so.
>
> After the files where moved, TC (or Explorer?) complained, that c:\wc1\dir1
> couldn't be deleted, because it was in use. A manual attempt to delete
> it failed, too. Since the folder was empty, I ignored the messages and
> planned to delete the folder later.
>
> After half an hour or so I noticed that my CPU was 60% busy and had
> become quite hot. According to Task-Manager, explorer.exe (not
> TSVNCache.exe) consumed 50% CPU.
The shell extension of TSVN does not consume that much CPU time. Even if
the cache is dead, it wouldn't use more than ~5% of CPU time while
trying to start the cache over and over again. All functions in the
extension either have a timeout or if they wait they do that without
using CPU time at all. So this can't be TSVN's fault.
Stefan
--
___
oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
(_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
\ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
/_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jul 8 18:21:53 2005