Mark Phippard wrote:
> I have clarified at least three times that this is not the case of Windows
> mis-interpreting anything. I am double-clicking out of habit, because I so
> frequently double-click down below in the list of files.
Yes, I got that. I'm pretty good at misunderstanding you, Mark, but I
finally got that.
> Molle Bestefich wrote:
>> I just think that removing the double click is the wrong
>> solution. Double-clicking is inherently useful for stuff that is a
>> little too dangerous for single-click but still harmless enough not to
>> be kept 3-4 mouse actions away.
>
> There is an option on the right-click menu of the revision to reverse the
> changes from that revision. If double-click did that option do you think
> that would be a good idea? Hopefully nor.
Obviously, you're equally good at misunderstanding what I say.
> All I ever said was that I did
> not think it was a good idea for double-click to fire off an option that
> can potentially lock up your system for a very long time, as the diff
> option potentially can.
[snip]
> So please stop muddying the issue by talking about
> mouse drivers and defective mice. That has nothing to do with this.
Oh! You're quoting me _completely_ out of context. Now you're just
out to hurt me. Ouch... My heart.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jun 10 14:49:07 2005