[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [TSVN] What overlays do we NEED

From: Peter McNab <mcnab_p_at_melbpc.org.au>
Date: 2005-04-14 10:50:11 CEST

Simon Large wrote:

>SteveKing wrote:
>
>
>>2005/4/14, Simon Large <slarge@slarge.plus.com>:
>>[snip]
>>
>>The only overlay I think *might* not be that important is the "added"
>>one. But that's also the first one to go down the drain if there are
>>not enough slots available.
>>
>>
>>
>>>>Hmmm now that I think about it more - is there any particular reason
>>>>why NOT to make the overlay slots we use User Configerable?
>>>>
>>>>
>>No need to - just delete the corresponding icon from the installation
>>folder.
>>
>>
>
>But if you delete 'Added' do you get 'Modified' automatically in its
>place?
>
>And when you upgrade (to the next nightly?), the icons will be back
>again.
>
>But all this is a _very_ low priority. Let's get the locking sorted ;-)
>
>Simon
>
>
>
Are we going to see the locked status for files burried deep in a
directory structure propogated to the top like the modified status?

Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Thu Apr 14 11:50:38 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.