[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [TSVN] Re: Re: New status cache

From: Will Dean <svn_at_indcomp.co.uk>
Date: 2005-02-01 13:12:15 CET

At 12:02 01/02/2005 +0000, you wrote:

>Which is exactly the number we have now, so no disruption when 1.2 adds
>locking. This sounds like a good plan to me. It's always nice to have
>more information, which the added and deleted icons give us, but with
>overlays it really is a luxury.

I'm more reluctant on this, I'm afraid. I think that 'added' is common and
useful. 'Deleted' is not so common, but when it appears, it's a serious
warning.

>If we really want 7 overlays, we could reduce the priority of 'added'
>and 'deleted' below 'locked' and 'fetching status', and we could
>(horror) have a setting to determine which overlays (or how many
>overlays) to include, so that TCVS doesn't suffer from our excessive
>usage.

Personally, I think I'd just go to 7 icons (still less than half the
total...) and let TCVS suffer. We could provide registry editing
instructions for people who *really* wanted to muck about with exactly
what's available.

Will

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Tue Feb 1 13:13:10 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.