Re: [TSVN] More on Commit dialog performance

Will Dean wrote:

>> 2) Use a virtual listcontrol instead that does not handle the strings
>> itself.
>
>
> Yes, that might well be better for big commits (for example), because
> the data is already all loaded into memory. That said, most of the time
> spent loading the commit listview is currently spent looking up icons
> for the files.
>
> I am about to post a patch which fixes some of this, though I haven't
> bothered to go to a virtual scheme, which is a load more hassle.

Would a virtual control even help here? I mean the data we get in the
notify callback from Subversion isn't stored in memory by TSVN. So it
wouldn't matter a lot if TSVN does the copy or the listcontrol?

Stefan

-- 
        ___
   oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
  (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
    \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
    /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org