[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [TSVN] Studies into SVN::UpdateShell

From: SteveKing <stefankueng_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2004-11-29 14:33:43 CET

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:20:30 +0000, Will Dean <svn@indcomp.co.uk> wrote:

> There *must* be a way to do this 'properly', because the shell itself copes
> fine with a change in single files, doing just the right amount of update.

Well, for the right-pane it will work. But the treeview (left-pane) is
worse than donkey.
You have to understand that it only works correctly if a file/folder
changed _directly_ in the folder you're currently viewing in explorer.
If e.g. a file below that changed, this means that the overlay for the
folder should change, but the explorer discards the refresh of this
because it can't see a change of that folder.
In a newsgroup, an MS dev once told that this had to be done for
performance reasons, because many programs just called the refresh
function even if the explorer didn't actually need a refresh. So since
then, that doesn't work correctly anymore.

Stefan

-- 
       ___
  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Mon Nov 29 14:34:20 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.