[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Re: Re: [Subclipse-users] New to Subclipse

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:55:38 -0400

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:45 AM, David Aldrich <david.aldrich_at_eu.nec.com>wrote:

That's clear, thanks very much.
>
> I would like to ask one more question of a more general nature. If you
> have time, I would appreciate your comments.
>
> I notice that Subclipse uses SVNKit. I have also noticed posts in the svn
> users mailing list that suggest that svn 1.7 works slowly on network drives
> compared with 1.6, and that work is ongoing in the svn client to improve
> svn 1.7's speed by optimising the MySQL queries used. My question is, how
> does such optimisation get transferred to SVNKit? Is there a similar focus
> on performance in the SVNKit community?
>

You would really have to ask them. http://svnkit.com

It is possible their performance is better or worse in this situation.
 Their code is completely different so it has different performance
characteristics.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=2990346
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].
Received on 2012-07-16 17:55:44 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.