[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Subclipse-users] Re: 1236: Scheduling rule violation in SVNMoveDeleteHook

From: Weiping Lu <wlu_at_us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:32:01 -0700

Hi Steve,

Noticed that you have already fixed this one too. Where can I get a build
that include this fix for test?

Many thanks,

Weiping

From:
Steve Elsemore <selsemore_at_collab.net>
To:
Weiping Lu/Cupertino/IBM_at_IBMUS, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Cc:
Bingxue Xu/Cupertino/IBM_at_IBMUS, <selsemore_at_tigris.org>, users
<users_at_subclipse.tigris.org>, Xiao Di Chen <xiaodic_at_cn.ibm.com>
Date:
02/04/2011 02:04 PM
Subject:
Re: [Subclipse-users] Re: 1236: Scheduling rule violation in
SVNMoveDeleteHook

Hi Weiping,

I’ve reopened issue 1236. I’ll see if I can fix it now.

Thanks,
Steve

On 2/2/11 4:33 PM, "Weiping Lu" <wlu_at_us.ibm.com> wrote:

Hi Mark/Stephen,

The case in http://subclipse.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1236 <
http://subclipse.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1236> has been fixed.

But we have also hit the same scheduling rule violation with another
slightly different scenario (please also refer to 1236's case):

=====================================================
Here are the steps for reproducing the condition before making
Resource.move call:

(1) The SVN files checked out in the work-space has the following file
structure:

workspace-root\plugin-a
                           \plugin-b\group\sub-group\element.xmi
where element.xmi is a file under the sub-group folder.

(2) Use Eclipse's IFolder's create(boolean force, boolean local,
IProgressMonitor monitor) API to create the following one folder
        workspace-root\plugin-a\group

(3) Now make the call to org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.Resource.move
with the calling resource instance object associated with the file
"workspace-root\plugin-b\group\subgroup" and the destination path string
associated with the path "workspace-root\plugin-a\group\sub-group".

At step (3), we got the same scheduling rule violation thrown from the
call thread inside subeclipse similar as that of 1236.
=====================================================

Please let me if you need more info.

Thanks,

Weiping

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
To: users <users_at_subclipse.tigris.org>
Cc: Weiping Lu/Cupertino/IBM_at_IBMUS, selsemore_at_tigris.org, Bingxue
Xu/Cupertino/IBM_at_IBMUS, Xiao Di Chen <xiaodic_at_cn.ibm.com>
Date: 01/28/2011 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Subclipse-users] Re: 1236: Scheduling rule violation in
SVNMoveDeleteHook

Subclipse 1.6.17 was released earlier this week. It contains this fix.

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Weiping Lu <wlu_at_us.ibm.com <
mailto:wlu_at_us.ibm.com> > wrote:

Hi Stephen,

Can you or any person in Subeclipe team give us a date that this fix will
be available for download or update?

This would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you,

Weiping

From: Weiping Lu/Cupertino/IBM
To: selsemore_at_tigris.org <mailto:selsemore_at_tigris.org>
Cc: users_at_subclipse.tigris.org <mailto:users_at_subclipse.tigris.org> ,
Bingxue Xu/Cupertino/IBM_at_IBMUS, Xiao Di Chen/China/IBM_at_IBMCN
Date: 01/25/2011 10:37 AM
Subject: 1236: Scheduling rule violation in SVNMoveDeleteHook

Hi Stephen,

Thank you very much for quickly fixing the issue:
http://subclipse.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1236 <
http://subclipse.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1236> .

Any advise that how we can get a build or updated version that contains
the fix?

Regards,

Weiping

------------------------------------------------------
http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=2702341

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].
Received on 2011-02-05 01:32:25 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.