[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Subclipse-users] Re: 1236: Scheduling rule violation in SVNMoveDeleteHook

From: Stephen Elsemore <selsemore_at_collab.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:07:47 -0800

Hi Weiping,

I¹ve reopened issue 1236. I¹ll see if I can fix it now.

Thanks,
Steve

On 2/2/11 4:33 PM, "Weiping Lu" <wlu_at_us.ibm.com> wrote:

>
> Hi Mark/Stephen,
>
> The case in http://subclipse.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1236
> <http://subclipse.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1236> has been fixed.
>
> But we have also hit the same scheduling rule violation with another slightly
> different scenario (please also refer to 1236's case):
>
> =====================================================
> Here are the steps for reproducing the condition before making Resource.move
> call:
>
> (1) The SVN files checked out in the work-space has the following file
> structure:
>
> workspace-root\plugin-a
> \plugin-b\group\sub-group\element.xmi
> where element.xmi is a file under the sub-group folder.
>
> (2) Use Eclipse's IFolder's create(boolean force, boolean local,
> IProgressMonitor monitor) API to create the following one folder
> workspace-root\plugin-a\group
>
> (3) Now make the call to org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.Resource.move
> with the calling resource instance object associated with the file
> "workspace-root\plugin-b\group\subgroup" and the destination path string
> associated with the path "workspace-root\plugin-a\group\sub-group".
>
> At step (3), we got the same scheduling rule violation thrown from the call
> thread inside subeclipse similar as that of 1236.
> =====================================================
>
> Please let me if you need more info.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Weiping
>
>
>
> From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
> To: users <users_at_subclipse.tigris.org>
> Cc: Weiping Lu/Cupertino/IBM_at_IBMUS, selsemore_at_tigris.org, Bingxue
> Xu/Cupertino/IBM_at_IBMUS, Xiao Di Chen <xiaodic_at_cn.ibm.com>
> Date: 01/28/2011 10:58 AM
> Subject: Re: [Subclipse-users] Re: 1236: Scheduling rule violation in
> SVNMoveDeleteHook
>
>
>
>
> Subclipse 1.6.17 was released earlier this week. It contains this fix.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Weiping Lu <wlu_at_us.ibm.com
> <mailto:wlu_at_us.ibm.com> > wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Can you or any person in Subeclipe team give us a date that this fix will be
> available for download or update?
>
> This would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Weiping
>
>
> From: Weiping Lu/Cupertino/IBM
> To: selsemore_at_tigris.org <mailto:selsemore_at_tigris.org>
> Cc: users_at_subclipse.tigris.org <mailto:users_at_subclipse.tigris.org> , Bingxue
> Xu/Cupertino/IBM_at_IBMUS, Xiao Di Chen/China/IBM_at_IBMCN
> Date: 01/25/2011 10:37 AM
> Subject: 1236: Scheduling rule violation in SVNMoveDeleteHook
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Thank you very much for quickly fixing the issue:
> http://subclipse.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1236
> <http://subclipse.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1236> .
>
> Any advise that how we can get a build or updated version that contains the
> fix?
>
> Regards,
>
> Weiping
>
>
>

------------------------------------------------------
http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=2702331

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].
Received on 2011-02-04 23:04:08 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.