Re: [Subclipse-users] CollabNet merge tool on Subclipse 1.6, Eclipse 3.5 OS X Carbon, javaHL

Have you played around with running memcached in front of Subversion in 1.6?

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Bradley
> Wagner<bradley.wagner_at_hannonhill.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The downside, is that you have to use the Apache it includes etc,
> >> which should be OK if just using it for SVN.
> >
> > Unfortunately it's not. This is been the worry with trying to upgrade SVN
> in
> > the first place. We should have looked into running SVN on it's on
> Apache,
> > different port from the beginning.
> >
> > What's your take on the SVN 1.3 to 1.6 jump as a developer? Worth it? I
> was
> > hoping for a serious performance boost for common operations (update,
> > checkout, merge, synchronize) and can't tell how much of that is there.
> The
> > merge-tracking alone though might be enough motivation for us.
>
> I cannot think of any significant performance boosts you should see.
> Some things like merge will likely even be slower.
>
> --
> Thanks
>
> Mark Phippard
> http://markphip.blogspot.com/
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=2367561
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [
> users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].
>

-- 
Hannon Hill - CMS Experience You Can Trust
(678) 904-6900 ext 115
http://www.hannonhill.com
------------------------------------------------------
http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=2367563
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].