[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: [Subclipse-users] Question about bugtraq properties

From: Michael Schechter <mschechter_at_national.aaa.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 09:40:29 -0400

Issue 886 filed.

Thanks again for all the assistance!

Michael Schechter
mschechter_at_national.aaa.com
RESPONSESupport_at_national.aaa.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Phippard [mailto:markphip_at_gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 2:01 PM
To: users_at_subclipse.tigris.org
Subject: Re: [Subclipse-users] Question about bugtraq properties

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Schechter, Michael
<MSchechter_at_national.aaa.com> wrote:

> Two things I want to leave you with:
> 1) The behavior issue that I am seeing appears to be related to the atomic commit behavior that
> we discussed last August, and that you fixed in bug 783. It still seems very odd to me that the
> behavior is inconsistent.

They are not really related at all, other than that the directory
layout is the same. The bottom line is that 99%+ of our code uses
Eclipse API for stuff and Eclipse does not know about things outside
the workspace. I think it is reasonable when we are using Eclipse to
crawl your project to stop at the project. Our only alternative would
be to switch to the Java IO classes for this.

The commit change was just a hack where it checks to see if the common
root folder of a commit is a WC or not. That mostly happens in the
SVN code. Hopefully this will become native to SVN in 1.7, as I am
sure the hack is going to stop working then one way or another.

> 2) In the cases where Subclipse correctly detects the bugtraq properties, there is a minor
> problem with the URL it builds. Our bug format is "Issue Number %BUGID%:\n", and when
>Subclipse displays the hyperlink in the history view, it includes the ":" as part of the link
>(TortoiseSVN does not do this). The resulting link tells me that bug "355:" does not exist. Is this an
> issue with Subclipse?

It sounds like it. Can you file an issue with all of your bugtraq
properties, a sample log message and the URL it uses?

--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=1498169
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].
This communication (including all attachments) is intended solely for
the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and should be treated
as a confidential AAA communication.  If you are not the intended
recipient, any use, distribution, printing, or copying of this email is
strictly prohibited.  If you received this email in error, please
immediately delete it from your system and notify the originator.  Your
cooperation is appreciated.
------------------------------------------------------
http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=1507079
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-04-01 15:40:44 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.