Re: [Subclipse-users] Large Project Performance Testing : Suggestion for Elapsed Time Feedback

"Marvin D. Toll" <MarvinToll@gtcGroup.com> wrote on 10/01/2006 09:16:23
PM:

> One of the nuances appreciated with Subversive is the "*** Ok (took
> 00:04.578)". Perhaps it seems like a minor feature - however, it is
helpful
> when comparing the two products ? or (more typically and importantly)
> setting expectations within a team for performance. (Subversive listing
> follows.)
>
> In addition, I appreciate the additional (console logging) verbosity -
> although this is readily admitted to be a matter of style. Two
scenarios
> where it is useful:
>
> 1) If one is "Updating" a 46,000 artifact project ... it is reassuring
to
> observe interim state.
>
> 2) The additional verbosity provides a complete transaction record.

You can file an issue about recording the time. If you want to include
anything about points 1 and 2, please explain what you mean in more
detail. Other than the time, I do not see any tangible difference in the
console output of Subclipse and Subversive.

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 3 22:17:32 2006