On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 01:29, Jörg von Frantzius wrote:
> (Bugzilla would call that a mid-air collision ;)
>
> Mark Phippard schrieb:
> > I just do not think it makes sense to offer an option in Subclipse that
> > we know does not work completely especially when there are good
> > alternatives. It is not that difficult to obtain JavaHL anymore and the
> > only barrier to using JavaSVN is file:// access for which there is a
> > workaround.
> >
> > Does anyone have any strong feelings against this? And if you do, are
> > you willing to invest the time to make the CommandLine adapter work?
> > With the new --xml options in Subversion 1.3, most features could
> > probably be implemented reliably if someone wanted to invest the time to
> > do so. I do not have the time or inclination to do so.
>
> I'd like to express my concern that the svn command line client per se
> seems to be the most robust of the 3 interfaces, at least that's my
> impression (JavaSVN and JavaHL are not hosted and developed on tigris,
> are they?). So it would make for a good last resort when there are
> problems with the other two.
>
> Which doesn't mean that I'd have the time to contribute, unfortunately :-/
JavaHL is an official part of Subversion, hosted at subversion.tigris.org.
--Andrew V.
Received on Sat Dec 3 01:59:55 2005